Pages

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

For all you 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists- this one's for you

For all you delusional 9/11 Conspiracy theorists: this video's for you!

This is what happens when an F4 Phantom jet crashes into a wall, at over 500 mph. It does NOT leave an imprint in the shape of a plane on the building. It is completely and thoroughly pulverized!

I hope this puts to rest at least that aspect of your ridiculous theory.

12 comments:

WomanHonorThyself said...

Hi there..thanks for visitin my site!..good point here but the Libs won't listen to reason... u know that right?..lol..:)

MUD said...

It has been a long day for me and I don't understand the point of the video. An airliner hitting a building with several thosand pounds of Av gas and full of passengers does not equate with an F-4 hitting a special wall made to resist such an impact. As I understand the World Trade Bldg failure it was all the Av gas that burned so hot it forced the steel to lose its temper that was the problem. I think people that create alternate theories for 9/11, the Holocast and Kennedy Assassins are just victims of too much time on their hands. Do people revise history? Yes in soime cases but not about things that happen out in the open. MUD

Incognito said...

WHT, Guess I'm just an eternal optimist. :-) Even enlightening one soul would be worth the time spent on this blog.

Hi MUD, yes they are 2 different situations (2 different kinds of planes etc) but I think the point of the video is to prove what happens to a fast moving, large object when it crashes into a non-movable structure. Some theorists seem to think that there were no planes.

Trevor Lyman said...

yeah- and the nice thing about this video is that it doesn't show you what the wall/ plane looks like afterwards. There is so much dust/smoke you don't really know whats going on with the plane or wall. In one approach it is without question that the wing makes it through the concrete- that proves wing damage and that supports the theories.

Here it is, proof right before your eyes but you say it is something that you assume it is. Talk about seeing only what you want to see! ;) Oh but I guess I must be a liberal.

Trevor Lyman said...

go to second 20 and watch the impact. When the nose hits the wall do you see the concrete move or do you see the steel buckle? The only thing I see taking damage is the wall. To me it looks like the plane must go right through it. Look again. This video only supports the theories.

Incognito said...

No, love, just delusional.

And exactly, that's all there was after 9/11, as well. A ton of dust and smoke.
And there are a zillion debunking websites out there.
I wrote a post about 9/11 and Holocaust deniers that links to one or two.
Thanks for stopping by.

Incognito said...

Hey Trevor, and as you say in your previous comment..one sees what one wants to see.

Cheers,

Trevor Lyman said...

sorry last post- but hey lets say it's true and the plane turns to dust and even though we see the wings go through the wall here lets pretend wings don't leave marks.

According to the official story they were able to identify all of the bodies. So you want to tell me that a plane can hit the pentagon and evaporate while leaving the bodies intact? Riiiiight. I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist simply because I think the governments story is false.. which it is. This is just one way that it is false. There are many many other parts where logic doesn't fit.

Anonymous said...

MUD,
Your argument is though provoking, however, I disagree with your assumption that there is no other logical reason as to why the Twin Towers fell. Fire can not manipulate steel; study has shown that steel buildings as strong and as tall as the Twin Towers did not collapse after withstanding a blazing fire. Also, the video tapes that showed the planes hitting the Twin Towers on 9/11 also give great detail as to how the gas was lost from the fireball, due to the collision. The reason for the conspiracy theories is that people are just trying to make sense of what really happened on 9/11 and trying to fill in the blanks.

Incognito said...

Anon, It all depends on which study you read and whether it is indeed based on fact. Studies can be manipulated to reflect the POV of the researchers. You can see what you want to see in any situation. There are people who see conspiracies in every thing in life, which is just daft.

Sometimes, there's good reason to question, but for the most part a daffodil is a daffodil and not a rose masquerading as one.

Trying to make sense of what really happened on 9/11? Almost 3,000 people were killed in 3 different locales because Islamist terrorists hijacked 3 planes in an effort to strongarm the west. That's what happened. Is that so hard to understand? They continue to kill westerners and their own people on a daily basis. They are doing their damndest to make sure democracy does NOT take root in the middle east. And if you don't think that they are attempting to eventually establish a global Kalifate by slowly trying to force the west to acquiesce to their way of thinking by making people fearful of doing anything to offend them (which then strengthens them), then you are going to be in for a very rude awakening, some day.

Anonymous said...

well, is rather obvious that

an f4 is smaller, and faster than a passenger plane.

that wall was designed to resist such an impact, didnt receive any damage, but in the pentagon, there was a huge hole, and no recognizable parts for a huge plane.

So, your "proof" does not really mean much.

Can't you recognize that your governemt lies to you?

If you were sincere, you will recognize this, and start to think arguments to defend the reasons to lie.

Incognito said...

Oh good grief. The lunatic fringe stops by.